Time to Rename Our Communion????

In his typically humorous way, the Mad Priest raises a very good question: should we rename the Anglican Communion to something a bit less, well, colonial:


Somebody apologised to me, in the comments, earlier today for calling me an Episcopalian. Not a problem, of course. In fact, I've pretty much come to think of myself as an Episcopalian. NOT as in TEC (My goodness! That would be slumming it), but as in Episcopal as opposed to Anglican.

I really do believe that we need to get rid of the word, Anglican, from the name of our communion. For a start, it is so colonial, to such a pervasive extent that the Grand Tufti really does believe he is emperor. It is also restrictive and bad for mission. Anybody living in countries that England has stuffed in the past can hardly be expected to join something so obviously English. Those who do are regarded as quizlings by their compatriots (this is very evident in India, for example).

The obvious word to replace Anglican is Episcopal. It says what we are and is perfectly adaptable for universal application. However, there are many episcopal churches in the world that are not aligned with our Communion at present and I don't think it would be fair to call ourselves just TEC in our international manifestation.

Read it all, and be sure to suggest a name on his blog.

Comments

MadPriest said…
Thanks Chuck
I was being very serious in my flippant way and I'm a bit disappointed in the lack of a serious response from my readers (they are perfectly capable of serious - they're just being a bit naughty at the moment).
I think a new name would help us define ourselves as a community of equals and do something to stop the illegal assuming of authority by the bishops of my national church.
April 22, 2007 at 4:45 AM
Chuck Blanchard said…
I too was surprised that no one has come up with a suggestion. i have to admit that I have not come up with one myself.
April 22, 2007 at 4:41 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Giles Fraser on Gay Marriage

Image
The Rev. Gileas Fraser offers thoughtful piece on gay marriage on BBC Radio this morning: Back in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, as the Book of Common Prayer was being put together, marriage was said to be for three purposes: First, It was ordained for the procreation of children … Secondly, It was ordained for a remedy against sin, and to avoid fornication .. Thirdly, It was ordained for the mutual society, help, and comfort, that the one ought to have of the other, both in prosperity and adversity. How do these three concerns relate to the prospect of gay marriage? The third priority insists that marriage is designed to bring human beings into loving and supportive relationships. Surely no one can deny that homosexual men and women are in as much need of loving and supportive relationships as anybody else. And equally deserving of them too. This one seems pretty clear. The second priority relates to the encouragement of monogamy. The Archbishop of Canterbury himself has rig...
Read more

Religious Map of United States

Image
This map shows which of eight major Christian denominations has a plurality in the United States, county by county. the map obviously does not capture the full story given the rich diversity of Christian denominations in the United States, but it does show much of the regionalization of the major denominations. The map and analysis can be found here . Hat Tip to my friend Jim .
Read more

Faith, Reason and Science, Part X: Some Humor and Serious Ponderings By A Thoughtful Atheist

Update : Welcome Digg visitors. For more of my posts on Science (including my Science and Faith series), go here .Interested in my take on atheism? Then try here . For my comments about the experience of being dugg, so here . Original Post : Eric Michael Johnson is a primatologist and endocrinologist completing a PhD at Duke University, and he blogs at the Primate Diaries . He has two recent posts that are worth reading. First, some provocative humor: Fundamentalists: believe 2+2 =5 because It Is Written. Somewhere. They have a lot of trouble on their tax returns. "Moderate" believers: live their lives on the basis that 2+2=4. but go regularly to church to be told that 2+2 once made 5, or will one day make 5, or in a very real and spiritual sense should make 5. "Moderate" atheists: know that 2+2 =4 but think it impolite to say so too loudly as people who think 2+2=5 might be offended. "Militant" atheists: "Oh for pity's sake. HERE. Two pebbles...
Read more